Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 01:17
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Is it possible to be a full-time, self-supporting working visual artist in today's society?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Can you show your wet and dripping pussy?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Protein Coffee Can Help You Build Muscle And Lose Weight—Here's How To Make It Taste Great - AOL.com
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Switch 2 quietly makes shiny hunting in Pokémon Scarlet and Violet way better - Polygon
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Why am I not getting any atheists to debate with? Are they scared?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
F1's Canadian GP will clash with the Indy 500 every five years - Motorsport.com
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What would have happened if Shin was a good movie instead of a bad one?